Raddy always headed straight to the next Tesco after collecting the dole. He bought four packets of rum flavoring, three bottles of vanillin and two pounds of sugar in the baking aisle and the cheapest bottle of gin available. At the Boots next door he grabbed a £ 2.99 bottle of obnoxious aftershave. Returning to his filthy one-room flat in Whitechapel he lit a fag and started stirring everything together in a rusty old pail. As the dazing fumes rose around him he began singing old military tunes, while nestling himself into a ragged tassled polyester smoking jacket he'd bought years ago at Marks and Sparks. Finally, he raised the pail above is head and poured the juice all over himself; then, puffing and blowing, he began to march around the room, chanting, ever louder and at last screaming at the top of his lungs: I AM THE RIGHTFUL LORD RADCLIFF, I AM THE RIGHTFUL LORD RADCLIFF, I AM THE RIGHTFUL LORD RADCLIFF...
As always, the neighbours started knocking on the walls, then the police arrived, and, finally, an ambulance. Holidays in Bedlam seemed inevitable. They knew him well there already, old "Roaring Radcliff."
Thursday, September 13, 2018
Thursday, September 6, 2018
Fragrant Remebrances of the Belle Époque
![]() | |||
| Renoir, La Loge (1874) Source: Wikipedia |
Harry Graf Kesseler (1868-1937), Gesichter und Zeiten. Erinnerungen [Faces and Times. Memories]. Berlin: S. Fischer Verlag, 1962 [1st. ed 1935], p. 10. Translated by the Duke of Pall Mall.
Friday, June 1, 2018
Against Power - Brecourt's Contre Pouvoir
![]() |
| Ceci n'est-ce pas une power scent |
It is true the ad copy relies on stereotypes of male power, the Club, cigars, leather armchairs, but really there is little of this to be found in the scent. It is not so much a powerhouse as a Dandyesque fragrance in the strict Brummelian meaning of that term: not exalted baroque but rather inconspicuously elegant, to the nines. It is from this characteristic that I find Mme. Bouge's creation to be less of a fall or winter scent but quite perfect for hot summer days, when it serves as an effective shield againt sweat and stench, as it gently but persistently radiates its irridescent aura of exotic citrus-spice and sweet woody powder, thus ennobling its wearer in ignoble circumstances. This strategy of a masculine skin scent appears more successful than many an attempt at camouflaging one's heat-induced odors by means of shrill aquatic-citrus-fabric-softener sledgehammers.
It is also a pleasure to observe a perfumer not overdosing on ambrox, for once, but using it as a soft-focus lense and diffuser; in fact, despite the modernity of the notes, this Eau de Toilette's feel harkens back to the classic era - the interwoven construction rather than blatant singularities, balance rather than a front-loaded firework; though there is only a subtle development in the scent. It aims at linearity, the citrus component proving to be quite persistent, and the most prominent notes, cardamom in the top, licorice in the heart, and a modern vetiver component at the base being deeply embedded and intertwined in the ambrox-diffusiveness noted above. Sweetness and spice, tartness and powder, beautfully entangled. In terms of its general appearance (including price) this fragrance thus appears to me less like your typical algorithm-spawned "niche" of the day, but more like an update of the kind of quality designer scents of the old school; the Van Cleef & Arpels, Cacharels, Jil Sanders and other pour hommes and Mans of my youth and young adulthood.I, for one, found myself pleasantly surprised and quite taken.
Wednesday, May 23, 2018
Dior Sauvage: The Black Hole of Perfumery
"But anything natural which has not been absorbed into utility by passing through the cleansing channels of conceptual order-the screech of stylus on slate which sets the teeth on edge, the haut-goût which brings to mind filth and corruption, the sweat which appears on the brow of the diligent - whatever is not quite assimilated, or infringes the commands in which the progress of centuries has been sedimented, is felt as intrusive and arouses a compulsive aversion."
"That is why smell, as both the perception and the perceived - which are one in the act of olfaction - is more expressive than other senses. When we see we remain who we are, when we smell we are absorbed entirely. In civilization, therefore, smell is regarded as a disgrace, a sign of the lower social orders, lesser races, and baser animals. The civilized person is allowed to give way to such desires only if the prohibition is suspended by rationalization in the service of practical purposes, real or apparent. One is allowed to indulge the outlawed drive if acting with the unquestionable aim of expunging it."
Theodor W. Adorno, Max Horkheimer, "Elements of Anti-Semitism," Dialectic of Enlightenment. Philosophical Fragments (first published 1949)
"I believe this is a very nice clean soapy scent. It may not conjure images of exotic far off places or rare ingredients from such places but it makes you feel enveloped by a squeaky clean aroma. [...] This is so nice and comforting and not cheap smelling. Great when you're in great looking casual clothing."
"Sauvage is an odd scent; it’s both generic and discordant at the same time. [...] It’s clearly a low-budget affair, yet it’s technically accomplished; it riffs on several mainstream cliches, then smashes them awkwardly together; it’s discordant and somewhat ugly, yet it’s primed for mass-consumption.
Reviews of Dior Sauvage on Basenotes, http://www.basenotes.net/fragrancereviews/fragrance/26146888
Something went unnoticed upon the release of Dior Sauvage in 2015. It marked and absolute end point of creative perfumery, a singularity of algorithm-driven commodification free from human interference, from culture, thus. It transcends aesthetic judgment, because that is not its domain. It smells, but it is not perfume. It is the signature scent of the self-disciplining neoliberal worker-drone, the expunging of smell by smell as described by Adorno and Horkheimer in the Dialectics of the Enlightenment (amusing to think they might have had Moustache by Rochas in mind, that urinous masterpiece worthy of Marcel Duchamp [double pun there]).
That so many people like it (in the way you like stuff on facebook, i.e. without any desire for exploration, reflexivity, depth) is no less a commentary on our civilization than the election of Donald Trump. Small fissures and fractures in overlooked places can also be telling.So what to do, when you encounter such an anti-matter miasma, a 21st century version of the plague? You do what they did back then, wear olfactory medicine - I suggest Ma'ai by Bogue.
"That is why smell, as both the perception and the perceived - which are one in the act of olfaction - is more expressive than other senses. When we see we remain who we are, when we smell we are absorbed entirely. In civilization, therefore, smell is regarded as a disgrace, a sign of the lower social orders, lesser races, and baser animals. The civilized person is allowed to give way to such desires only if the prohibition is suspended by rationalization in the service of practical purposes, real or apparent. One is allowed to indulge the outlawed drive if acting with the unquestionable aim of expunging it."
Theodor W. Adorno, Max Horkheimer, "Elements of Anti-Semitism," Dialectic of Enlightenment. Philosophical Fragments (first published 1949)
"I believe this is a very nice clean soapy scent. It may not conjure images of exotic far off places or rare ingredients from such places but it makes you feel enveloped by a squeaky clean aroma. [...] This is so nice and comforting and not cheap smelling. Great when you're in great looking casual clothing."
"Sauvage is an odd scent; it’s both generic and discordant at the same time. [...] It’s clearly a low-budget affair, yet it’s technically accomplished; it riffs on several mainstream cliches, then smashes them awkwardly together; it’s discordant and somewhat ugly, yet it’s primed for mass-consumption.
Reviews of Dior Sauvage on Basenotes, http://www.basenotes.net/fragrancereviews/fragrance/26146888
Something went unnoticed upon the release of Dior Sauvage in 2015. It marked and absolute end point of creative perfumery, a singularity of algorithm-driven commodification free from human interference, from culture, thus. It transcends aesthetic judgment, because that is not its domain. It smells, but it is not perfume. It is the signature scent of the self-disciplining neoliberal worker-drone, the expunging of smell by smell as described by Adorno and Horkheimer in the Dialectics of the Enlightenment (amusing to think they might have had Moustache by Rochas in mind, that urinous masterpiece worthy of Marcel Duchamp [double pun there]).
That so many people like it (in the way you like stuff on facebook, i.e. without any desire for exploration, reflexivity, depth) is no less a commentary on our civilization than the election of Donald Trump. Small fissures and fractures in overlooked places can also be telling.So what to do, when you encounter such an anti-matter miasma, a 21st century version of the plague? You do what they did back then, wear olfactory medicine - I suggest Ma'ai by Bogue.
Friday, May 18, 2018
A Natural Gourmand for Gourmets: Chocolat Irisé by Annette Neuffer
How you perceive, classify and evaluate
scents fundamentally depends your broader socio-cultural and personal
biographical scent socialization. There is no doubt my high
sensitivity towards monomolecular synthetic aromachemicals is owed to
the abscence of most functional perfumery in our household: for
decades we have only used unfragranced detergents, cleaners etc. and
only naturally fragranced cosmetics and soaps. As a result I perceive
much of the world and people around me as regular synth-bombs reeking
of dihydromyrcenol, calone, ambroxan, ethylvanillin etc., all of
which they seem hardly even to register. At such moments I sympathize
with perfume prohibition in the workplace, though that will not
eliminate the fascinating phenomenon of long-unwashed clothes still
exuding „april-fresh“ wafts of fabric softener scent. Many of my
fellow citizens, children and adults alike, seem completely desensitized
when it comes to this olfactory overkill, while at the same time
finding the natural smell of a body to be completely inacceptable and
"unhygienic." I ask myself sometimes: what should be the consequence of the fact
that all humans are principally entirely and intuitively capable of
differentiating between monomolecular and complex natural
scents, between phenethyl alcohol and rose oil? Considering, as a
legendary Slow Food experiment showed, that children not exposed to
unprocessed foods tended to prefer the synthetic aroma of strawberry
yoghurt to the challenging complexity of a real strawberry, a sign of
gustatory and olfactory impoverishment, of a brutal sensory
limitation to engaging the complexity and sensory reality of the
world. This is not so much an immediate health issue, but one of
aesthetics and of aisthesis (humans as sensorily perceiving bodies) ; it raises fundamental questions about
the nature of our being-in-the-world. Perhaps it is time to consider
the question of naturals and synthetics (a difficult differentiation, but if you prefer: complex naturally sourced scents and monomolecules)
in perfumery from this vantage point, rather than the misleading
debate about allergies (which are just as likely to be caused by natural
oils with hundreds of secondary and tertiary components than by synthetics).
Soooo....As Chocolat Irisé has once
more proven to me, the fact that I detest with a passion the great
majority of gourmand perfumes has nothing at all to do with the genre
as such, but with its consistent cultivation of artificiality
grounded in massive monomolecular overdosing. A good crème brulée
can only be made with real vanilla pods, not vanillin flavouring, and
a good gourmand requires a high percentage of natural oils with a
complex olfactory spectrum. Sure, Jacques Guerlain's Shalimar
contained vanillin, but it also brimmed with tonka, iris, 30% (!)
bergamot, as well as jasmine, rose, birch tar, patchouli, sandalwood
and more and more and more. The beauty of unobtrusive complexity!
And so we come to Annette Neuffers take
on the oriental gourmand, Shalimar naturelle en cacao, so to say. The
absence of synthetics and the quality of the natural raw materials
means that balance and complexity reign sovereign here; the perfumer's
talent ensures that the chocloate-vanilla soufflé does not collapse
into olfactory porridge; and the all-natural compositon prevents outré
displays of sillage and intensity. It is, in sum, wonderful. The opening is powerfully
citric-floral, I get stronger „orangey“ impressions from the
tangerine over the tart bergamot and more white-floral aspects than
rose (which, however, rises a bit later). Cocoa notes come into play
very quickly and prompt associations of old fashioned hot chocolate
made from the real thing rather than industrial powder. A wonderful
olfactory baldachin of floral notes unfolds supported by the
cocoa-vanilla scaffold, with the gentle iris building a bridge
between florality and vanilla sweetness. The smokey earthiness of
patchouli also gently holds hands with that aspect of the oh so multifaceted vanilla, the rest of the base
remains softly at the back. Close to the skin you can cherish the
lusciously complex exotic pod that our culture has so unjustly turned into a signifier of blandness. The whole composition settles down
after about half an hour to a wonderfully woven skin scent with a
gentle aura - gentle in no way connoting feminine here, but really a
unisex quality. I actually feel it is the nose-searing loudness of synthetic
gourmands tha project a sort of misguided hyper-femininity of the
worst sort.
Chocolat Irisé is true to its name, a
beautiful, classy, but easily worn pleasure scent recommended to all lovers of
Guerlinade and traditional hot chocolate, friends of natural
sweetness and spice, and those who have wondered why the can't handle
gourmands, even though they love a fine dessert.
Thursday, January 19, 2017
The Same Company [review of Le 15 by The Different Company]
There's a strange atmosphere at the 15th anniversary event. Canned music metallically wafts through the dingy hall, some kind of royalty free cover versions of "The Greatest Hits of the 2000s." Faded garlands hang limply from the ceiling, revealing barely legible strings of letters - "Com-e -es Gar-ons: I--ense" - somebody in controlling probably got them second hand for a song. There's stale peanuts and crisps - leftovers from JC Ellena's going-away party? - and too little to drink. Most of the naturals department staff haven't even shown up, just a few indivuals from the citrus project group sitting forlorn on the hard wooden benches, throwing embarassed glances at the main table set up in front of the small stage. That's where Iso E Super and Cashmeran are pulling off their act, duly intoxicated (so that's where the drinks ended up) belting along to the hits of yesteryear with smeary drunken voices, cig in hand, unshaven, in sweaty shirts and spotty suits. "They've really let themselves go in recent years," a pale and somewhat sickly looking Mrs. Vetiver from accounting whispers across the table to Mr. Nutmeg from the PR department, decent fellow, not too smart, but with a perfectly tended suntan. At some point the music is abruptly cut off in the middle of a godawful rendition of Robbie Williams' "Millenium." The Managing Director takes the mic and after seemingly endless moments of amplified crackling and ugly feedback screeches delivers a stammering attempt at a speech patched together with the kind of tired clichés you'd find on a hectic google search twenty minutes before you're on. "Being diff'rent means staying diff'rent," he concludes amidst sputtering coughs. Not that anyone has been listening; and the drunks are still having at millenial rock and pop. At around eleven a merciful fate releases the staff into a greyish-damp night, the smell of a failed party hovers over the deserted scene. The janitor trundles across the hall with a rattling key chain, locking up and turning off the lights. He doesn't notice the two inebriates under the table, though he briefly sniffs and grimaces. He lights a fag and mutters something like "what's the point of all this?" and exits. Curtain.
Tuesday, November 15, 2016
Varon Dandy Part 2: The Fougère Cousin of Knize Ten
![]() |
| Source of original images: https://perfumecharm.wordpress.com/2016/04/17/knize-ten-by-knize-perfume-review/ and parfumo.de |
The Knize Ten
|
Shared notes
|
Varon Dandy
|
Lemon, Orange, Rosemary
|
Bergamot, Petitgrain
|
Lavender, Anise, Clary Sage
|
Rose, Iris, Cinnamon
|
Geranium, Cedar, Carnation, Sandalwood
|
Fern
|
Castoreum, Vanilla
|
Oakmoss, Amber, Musk
|
Tonka
|
At last we return to Varón Dandy, whose history I discussed back in August. As I suggested then, I find it to be a relative of Knize Ten - they may be from different streets, Chypre Boulevard and Fougère Avenue, but the neighbourhood is the same: 1920s men's fragrance and they share a surprising number of notes that give them both a similar old-time feel of powdery-spicy florality.
As you can see from the table above, Varón is an old-school barbershop fougère: a citrus-lavender top with green clary sage, very powdery from the get go, a heavily coumarinic heart ornamented with some florals and woods, that has a primarily powdery soapy-carnation feel to it and a sweet-mossy-musky base. It doesn't last too long and generally comes across like an old-fashioned hotel soap (the reason of course being, that these were frequently fragranced with a standard fougère formula). It makes me want to wear a top hat and truly feels like from a different era, one that still lingers on in some increasingly obscure old-boy grooming products (like the Spanish Floid Aftershave) but has all but disappeared from the fashionable perfume world (although it is still echoed in a scent such as Burberry Brit for Men). Clearly it's hanging on in the Spanish and Spanish-speaking nicks of the wood though, just as Tabac Original is north of the Alps.
The leathery chypre Knize Ten is darker and heavier from the outset with its motor oil-floral combo, but the cousins share the dense clovey-woody powderiness of the heart, with a more textured florality in the Viennese scent and the serious sweetness of cinnamon, where Varòn's fern-floral is almost giddy and somewhat flat by direct comparison. The castoreum and leather notes create ever more depth where the Spaniard treads more lightly with sweet musk and amber, with just a smattering of moss, though the combination does in fact create a suede-like effect. Varón Dandy has been described as a woody, leathery, animalic and oriental fragrance , so perhaps, in previous iterations, it was even closer to Knize than it is in its current state - oh to have a vintage bottle of Parera-made juice, which I suspect might have pulled more punch and contained more facets. As it is, the Spaniard is a paler, slightly anemic cousin to the Austrian Dandy, one whose tails have perhaps been a bit tattered from an awfully long history in the mass market, a fate of so many old timers that Knize Ten has yet miraculously avoided.Still - I like its old world aura and it would probably be considered less obnoxious by many a mainstream nose than Knize Ten. I imagine the infamous L'Air de Panache in Wes Anderson's Grand Budapest Hotel as being pretty close to Varón Dandy, even if Mark Buxton decided to render it as a Chypre.
![]() | ||
| Source: http://www.vogue.com/866538/lair-de-panache-what-wes-andersons-fragrance-smells-like/ |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






